North Korea Impressions
By
Aron Harilela
The Harilela Group
There seems to be an oft-repeated mantra in
Asia since the Asian Financial Crisis hit the region. That mantra is:
It is the countries that swallow the bitter
pill of reform that will emerge from the crisis sooner and more robust.
I was completely in the dark when it came
to the North Korean economy and could only imagine that, like other Communist and
Socialist economies, it was primarily driven by agriculture and state run enterprises
dealing in heavy industry. Furthermore, despite claims of self-sufficiency, no country has
to date achieved it in practice and therefore self-sufficiency is an economic dream never
to be realized in our present state of economics. Hence I deduced that North Korea had to
have some trading partners. And I thought that is was the diminution of this trade,
whether it was barter or driven by the market economy, that had put the Democratic
Peoples' Republic of Korea in a
position in which the bitter pill of reform was necessary for the economic stabilization
of the country. Logically, one would think that this is the start of the opening of the
economy, similar to what has happened in China.
However, there was one mistaken assumption
in this apparent tautology - and
that is that the North Korean Government does not appear to want to reform. It does not
want to join the international economic arena even at its own pace. What it wants is
Foreign Direct Investment; Foreign Currency for the short term. It wants investors to come
in and to invest. The DPRK Government will then use that money to stabilize their industry
and their economy both of which have suffered immense blows as a result of the collapse of
barter trade as a consequence of the collapse and reform of Communist and Socialist
economies in the former USSR and in China. The DPRK Government will furthermore invest
that money in feeding its populace and to position North Korea to its former isolationist
splendour.
The big question on all of our minds is
'what will become of the investment that supposedly will poured into North Korea after the
economy has been stabilized and that isolationist splendour has been re-gained and the FDI
is not needed anymore?' I suppose all investments will be ostracized to the economic zone
of Rajin Sonbong, in the Northern and Eastern Uppermost of the Country. This is the
impression I had of the intentions of the Government.
Do I believe this will happen?
No I do not.
Trade and the economic prosperity that
accompanies it is contagious. The State Run Enterprises that will be trading with foreign
companies will start to understand the fundamentals of trade and international commerce.
This has a dizzying effect and the longer international companies stay in North Korea, the
longer and more encompassing the arms of trade become. I believe that what has happened in
China will happen in North Korea. I do not believe though that this change will take place
overnight but I do believe that it will take place over the next 10-20 years.
The obvious question, if one were to follow
such an argument, is whether North Korea would be prosperous in the future. This is a
multi-faceted question.
One element is the internal soft and hard
infrastructure that must be put into place to support a market-driven economy. The
Government has already has already put together a system of laws to govern economic
activity in the special economic zone of Rajin Sonbong. This must be supported by the
software that is required to sustain an environment in which international companies would
want to invest. At this time, there was a general consensus in our delegation that if a
dispute flared, the North Korean entity would inevitably win without even a fight. This is
to be expected in any country that has had no foreign contact. This must, however, change.
Common law and Company Law must exist. But it takes time and a general willingness to
accept and to learn from the foreign legal and business systems.
Another major element in the possible
prosperity of North Korea is its trading partners. North Korea is surrounded by Asia’s giants, most of whom are looking for
more and more routes to increase the flow of equity capital and decrease the existence of
debt capital. There are many other factors but all in all, I believe North Korea has a
fighting chance if it decides to take it.
From a more personal point of view, it is
one of the most eye-opening trips I have been on. Customs was a long and drawn-out affair.
We handed over our passports, various forms that we filled out and our mobile phones which
were retained for the duration of our stay. We arrived in the Hotel Koryo, a hotel that
was seemingly a relic of the 1950s and 1960s. I asked one of our guides when it was built.
He answered with a look of pride in his face, that it was built in the early 1980s. The
architecture of Pyongyang was homogenous. Most buildings were of a brown-grey coloured
cement and looked as if they were built only for their functional value and with no
thought given to any aesthetic value. There was also a 105 storey hotel, the construction
of which was stopped because of a lack of funds which now still stands like an enormous
pyramid and eye sore in the middle of Pyongyang. This could only happen in a country like
North Korea, I thought to myself.
Our first sight we were taken to was an
enormous statue of Kim Il Song. The statue must have been at least 10 metres tall, flanked
on both sides by 15 metre long relics depicting the Korean people overcoming the Japanese
Occupation on one side and the creation of the DPRK on the other side. As we stood there
and looked in amazement, people came and worshipped the statue, put down flowers while
school children swept the ground in an organized row. What became evident over the next
couple of days, was that the whole country as well as the whole society is built around
the thoughts of freedom from the Japanese Occupation and Western Imperialism and the
Creation of the Democratic Peoples’ Republic of Korea. Even today, people are mindful of these events, building their
every action and thought around the building up of their country. To me, what was even
more shocking was that I found it to be one of the quietest societies I have ever been to.
The school children swept in silence. People walked on the streets and did not seem to
talk to each other. When some of us took a walk around the streets at night, people were
sitting in the parks talking to one another in hushed tones. Maybe people were so quiet
because before the turmoil that is happening now, there were no contradictions in North
Korean society. Everything was made to plan. Everything was in order.
We were not starred at or pointed at.
People did not seem to care about the outside world. Surprisingly we were not stopped from
walking anywhere in the streets. It was only when we attempted to enter a train station at
night, the same one we entered the afternoon after without obstruction, that a lady
dressed in very well ironed khakis, an arm band and a hat impeded our path and started
rambling in Korean without stopping for a breath or a second thought to the fact that none
of us had any idea what she was saying. The only other place we were stopped from entering
was a restaurant frequented by locals. We were emphatically turned away and told us to go
to our hotel to eat. I still do not know whether they did not want us to see how the
locals Koreans lived or whether they did not want the locals to fraternize with the
capitalist foreigners. I found this rather peculiar because when we did communicate with
some locals, they were very happy to exchange smiles and gestures.
By our hosts we were treated royally. We
were taken to see government official in ostentatiously Communist-styled governmental
buildings situated in larger than life Tian An Man type squares, which in turn were
situated next to a perfectly banked river filled with quiet, ordered school children.
Strangely enough, we hardly saw any elderly people. It seemed like the whole of Pyongyang
was populated with young people and children.
The trip to North Korea was indeed an
eye-opener. Pyongyang was not what I expected to see. I expected a dreary place without
life and exuberance. It was far from that. Most of the architecture was drab but the
people were hospitable and warm. They went about their business as in any other city in
the world. One could see that Pyongyang was once a, and I use this term lightly,
prosperous city of splendour and grandeur, rocked only by the collapse of trade. The very
discernable difference was that this was a city built without the influence of or exposure
to any foreign influence. If one could imagine what HK would look like without any
influence from Britain, China or any exterior forces and with a large element of order, I
am sure that it would not look very different.
Everyone in North Korea has to wear a badge
of either Kim Dong Il or Kim Il Song every day. One cannot buy this in any shop. It is
simply not for sale. Foreigners are not supposed to have one. We, however, got on so well
with our hosts that at the end of one dinner, we were all presented with one which we wore
on our lapels. I wonder whether this is a sign of the opening up of North Koreans to
foreigners, a gesture that signified that they were giving to the outside world a little
bit of their country as we were looking to give some of ours to them.
|